<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
- To: "Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:59:09 -0500
That's an idea were discussion further Wolf. Thanks.
I also think it would be a good idea on Monday in our meeting to try to
find out if we can identify at least two OSC volunteers for each of the
three teams including chairs. If we are successful, then it will solve
the issue.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 9:51 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft
Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
Chuck,
then lets discuss this:
1) select WT members + chair
2) appoint the chair as "other participant to the OSC"
See you on Monday
Best regards
Wolf
________________________________
Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Dezember 2008 15:41
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx;
gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft
Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
Wolf,
I totally agree with your intention but let me share my thinking
on this:
1) Chairing one of the work teams is going to be a big
responsibility that will last many months;
2) Several of the OSC members are already very busy in the GNSO
aside from their regular jobs;
3) The OSC is a relatively small team so finding 3 different
members who have the skills and are willing and available to take on the
responsibility of chairing a work team seems like a long shot to me.;
4) If we establish this as a requirement and then cannot find 3
people, then we have to modify the requirement;
5) In my opinion a better approach is to not have the
requirement in the first place;
6) If we don't have the requirement but most on the OSC like the
idea of having an OSC member as chair, then we could still try to do it.
7) We could actually explore whether we have three qualified
volunteers in the OSC before we make a decision on this suggested
requirement.
Let's talk about this with the full team on Monday along with
any other issues of the charter.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 9:20 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx;
gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team
Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
My intention was to ensure the closest cooperation
between Work Teams and SCs as possible in order to avoid unnessessary
rediscussion on two levels.
This could also be achieved if you add to the
SC-charters (here: OSC) under "Other Participants in the OSC":
*
Chair person of each Work Team
Best regards
Wolf
________________________________
Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2008 23:10
An: Robert Hoggarth; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team
Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
I must have missed that.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Robert Hoggarth
[mailto:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 4:08 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications
Work Team Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
Thanks, Chuck. I'll double check that.
Wolf added the chair comment as an edit/comment
on the wiki back during the Summer for all three work teams.
RobH
________________________________
From: Gomes, Chuck
To: Robert Hoggarth; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri Dec 12 12:39:08 2008
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications
Work Team Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
Thanks Rob. The redline version appears to end
in the middle of the first sentence of Section IV.
At the end of Section IV, item 7 says, "The
chair of the team should be someone from the associated steering
committing." Where did this come from? I have not particular objection
to someone from the OSC being chair, but I see no reason to have that
restriction.
Under Decision Making, I am not sure "full
consensus of the members" process" will work for work teams, but I am
comfortable with the work teams making a recommendation in that regard.
I suggesst we leave Rob's comment in the draft as guidance for the work
team.
In Section VII, it might be good to add
potential team projects for each of the other goals listed in Section
II, even if we only list the name of the project with no detail.
Finally, I suggest we add a section called
something like "Work Team Rules" and include the rules we have been
using for WGs to the extent that they fit.
We can discuss the above in our meeting Monday.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 12:45 PM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications
Work Team Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
Dear OSC Members:
Pursuant to my previous message,
attached please find the clean and red-line versions of the Draft
Charter for the Communications Work Team.
Look forward to talking with you all on
Monday.
Best regards,
Rob Hoggarth
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|