AW: [gnso-osc] Draft Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Trying to make the announcement more effective I rearranged the proposal (Main page + background information) as attached. That's no content change, just an communication improvement, hopefully. BTW since finding volunteers seems to be the real challenge, why shouldn't we - in worst case only - think about incentives? Best regards Wolf-Ulrich _____ Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2008 00:53 An: Robert Hoggarth; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] Draft Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams Thanks Rob (and probably Liz and Ken too). To get discussion going, I proposed some edits and inserted some comments that are highlighted in the attached file. To minimize confusion, I suggest that everyone use the attached version, understanding that you should feel free to disagree with my suggestions and suggest new changes. Chuck _____ From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:10 PM To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [gnso-osc] Draft Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams Dear OSC Members: Pursuant to your discussion on yesterday's call, attached please find a draft announcement seeking volunteers for the GNSO "Improvements" Implementation Work Teams. The announcement is currently designed for all five GNSO work teams (three OSC teams and two PPSC teams). Decision/feedback points include: * General edits and comments regarding form, style and text; * Announcement methodology - is the group OK with email announcement as well as ICANN web site announcement? * Contact points - left blank in the draft, to whom do you think expressions of interest should be directed? * Statements of Interest - do you think these are appropriate for work teams? Please direct all comments to the entire list. Best regards, Rob Hoggarth Attachment:
Work Teams Invite Draft 15Dec08 (RHv3 KBv1) with Gomes + Knoben comments.doc
|