<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
AW: [gnso-osc] Draft Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
- To: <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
 
- Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] Draft Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
 
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:19:46 +0100
 
 
 
Sorry Stéphane and Chuck,
 
that's not the way to go. Before we discuss potential kinds of incentives (I 
could imagine a variety of) we should reach a harmonized view about
- whether it is worth or not to offer incentives (my opinion is: yes but only 
in case we fail in the first call for volunteers)
- that ICANN should bear related costs (do we need Board approval for that?)
 
Let's start with a non-incentive call and see what happens.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Deutsche Telekom AG 
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 140
D - 53113 Bonn
+49 2244 873999 (Tel.)
+49 2151 5300 5206 (PC-Fax)
+49 151 1452 5867 (Mobil)
http://www.telekom.com <http://www.telekom.com/> 
Deutsche Telekom AG
Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner (Vorsitzender)
Vorstand: René Obermann (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Karl-Gerhard Eick (stellvertretender Vorsitzender)
Hamid Akhavan, Manfred Balz, Reinhard Clemens, Timotheus Höttges, Thomas 
Sattelberger
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 6794
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn
WEEE-Reg.-Nr.: DE50478376
 
  _____  
Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2008 14:16
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] Draft Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Wolf,
 
I like having the invitation right up front.  Good idea.
 
Like Stephan, I am curious about what incentives we could offer.
 
Chuck
  _____  
From: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 5:39 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] Draft Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Trying to make the announcement more effective I rearranged the proposal (Main 
page + background information) as attached. That's no content change, just an 
communication improvement, hopefully.
 
BTW since finding volunteers seems to be the real challenge, why shouldn't we - 
in worst case only - think about incentives?
 
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
 
  _____  
Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von 
Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2008 00:53
An: Robert Hoggarth; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] Draft Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Thanks Rob (and probably Liz and Ken too).  To get discussion going, I proposed 
some edits and inserted some comments that are highlighted in the attached 
file.  To minimize confusion, I suggest that everyone use the attached version, 
understanding that you should feel free to disagree with my suggestions and 
suggest new changes.
 
Chuck
  _____  
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Robert Hoggarth
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:10 PM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] Draft Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Dear OSC Members:
Pursuant to your discussion on yesterday's call, attached please find a draft 
announcement seeking volunteers for the GNSO "Improvements" Implementation Work 
Teams.  The announcement is currently designed for all five GNSO work teams 
(three OSC teams and two PPSC teams).
Decision/feedback points include:
*       General edits and comments regarding form, style and text; 
*       Announcement methodology - is the group OK with email announcement as 
well as ICANN web site announcement? 
*       Contact points - left blank in the draft, to whom do you think 
expressions of interest should be directed? 
*       Statements of Interest - do you think these are appropriate for work 
teams?
Please direct all comments to the entire list.
Best regards,
Rob Hoggarth
 
 
 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |