ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council Proxy Procedures

  • To: <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council Proxy Procedures
  • From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:21:40 +0200

interesting to learn of possible absences from the next council meeting.
Which votes outside of the 4 e-mail votable areas will be affected?

If the key issue is NOT proxy as a remedy for abstentions, 
BUT  proxy as a remedy for absences, then it seems to be a better solution would
be to remove the 4 category limit for e-mail votes?

OR, if Council prefers to vote and know an outcome at the meeting (a good idea
methinks), perhaps we should consider simplification as follows:
a) scrap e-mail votes
b) scrap directed voting
c) liberalise proxy voting as the only remedy.

Thoughts ?


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy