<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council Proxy Procedures: Clarification
- To: <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council Proxy Procedures: Clarification
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:46:26 +0200
Thanks Ken,
I hoped had had caught this is my point 2 but your detail is most helpful.
Personally, I find the idea of declaring an abstention when in fact its an
absence to be odd.
At best it is confusing, at worst deceptive (especially if a voting direction is
then provided by the absent Councilor) !
I'd be interested to learn why this construction was invented.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|