Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council Proxy Procedures: Clarification
- To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council Proxy Procedures: Clarification
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:08:23 -0500
On 5 Apr 2011, at 09:46, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> Personally, I find the idea of declaring an abstention when in fact its an
> absence to be odd.
> At best it is confusing, at worst deceptive (especially if a voting direction
> then provided by the absent Councilor) !
I have long felt this, but was in a minority of one objecting to the idea of
using abstention for dealing with absence on the WT. i eventually surrendered
and accepted it as yet another example of bizarre icanninan logic.