<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] "Competition" in the Secondary Domain Name Market
- To: PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] "Competition" in the Secondary Domain Name Market
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:03:54 -0500
great discussion! i too am sorry to have missed the call (and to
compound my delinquency, i haven't had time to listen to the MP3 yet
either).
here are a few tidbits for conversation...
tidbit 1
a friend of mine used the following definition of "monopoly" in a
recent blog post (on broadband, not domain names) which appeared in
lots of places when i Googled the text:
"the exclusive possession or control of the supply or trade in a
commodity or service."
we seem to be agreeing that there is a period in the domain-expiration
cycle where registrars have exclusive control over the domain name --
so maybe we want to use that language rather than "monopoly"? it
seems to me that it's almost inevitable that there will be such a
period.
tidbit 2
if we presume that there's a period of exclusive-control, it seems to
me that it might be useful to clearly describe;
• what that period is
• what the "rules of the road" are during that period
• whether those rules are theoretically sufficient to protect the
interests of all parties
• see how consistently those rules are being applied, and
• determine if anything needs to be done (clarify/strengthen/
publicize the rules, change the interval of exclusive control, etc.)
mikey
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|