Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Executive summary

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Marika  here  the full recs in the Exec Summary is <sadly>
needed...  and  the use of the condensed version in the announce  is OK with
me as long as the reference lunk to the FULL version is clear  (in that it
links to a fuller version) in the announce ...


Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 21 February 2011 21:27, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Hi Alan,
>
> One of the reasons why we typically include the full recommendations in
> the Executive Summary is that in some cases it might be the only part of
> the report that people will read. In addition, it is the only section that
> will get translated, so it might be better to include the full
> recommendations here as well even if these are already covered in other
> sections of the report.
>
> To make sure your effort wasn't for nothing, I would like to use your
> condensed version in the announcement, with a reference to the complete
> version that people can review in the report, if you agree.
>
> With best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> On 19/02/11 18:31, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >I just noticed that there are extraneous bullets all over the Exec
> >Summary.
> >
> >Also, I have taken the liberty of trying to condense the
> >recommendations for the Summary. If the group feels that they are a
> >fair representation of the Recs, this can be used to reduce the size
> >of the Exec Summary by several pages. A bit more if we omit the
> >Charter questions.
> >
> >Alan
>
>
>