Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Executive summary

[Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Alan

Hope that the Executive Summary includes a link to the detailed report and a
link to minority opinion / comments.


Thank you.
Sivasubramanian M


On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> I agree with Marika  here  the full recs in the Exec Summary is <sadly>
> needed...  and  the use of the condensed version in the announce  is OK with
> me as long as the reference lunk to the FULL version is clear  (in that it
> links to a fuller version) in the announce ...
>
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> (CLO)
>
>
>
>
> On 21 February 2011 21:27, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> One of the reasons why we typically include the full recommendations in
>> the Executive Summary is that in some cases it might be the only part of
>> the report that people will read. In addition, it is the only section that
>> will get translated, so it might be better to include the full
>> recommendations here as well even if these are already covered in other
>> sections of the report.
>>
>> To make sure your effort wasn't for nothing, I would like to use your
>> condensed version in the announcement, with a reference to the complete
>> version that people can review in the report, if you agree.
>>
>> With best regards,
>>
>> Marika
>>
>> On 19/02/11 18:31, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >I just noticed that there are extraneous bullets all over the Exec
>> >Summary.
>> >
>> >Also, I have taken the liberty of trying to condense the
>> >recommendations for the Summary. If the group feels that they are a
>> >fair representation of the Recs, this can be used to reduce the size
>> >of the Exec Summary by several pages. A bit more if we omit the
>> >Charter questions.
>> >
>> >Alan
>>
>>
>>
>