<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter
- To: "ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 00:01:15 +0000
I think the most widely accepted definition of gTLD is generic top level name
in contrast to ccTLD. In that definition sTLDs are a subset of gTLDs. That is
certainly the way we define it in the RySG.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 4:51 PM
To: Alan Greenberg
Cc: Marika Konings; Holly Raiche; gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter
On 7/2/13 1:32 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> A process for developing gTLD policy ...
Historically, "gTLD" has had two meanings: registries other than sponsored
TLDs, for which a source of ongoing policy other than a contract with ICANN
existed, viz sTLDs {.aero,.coop,.museum,.cat,...} and gTLDs
{.biz,.info,.name,.pro, as well as .com,.org,.net}, and all registries other
than ccTLDs.
Just to clarify, you mean "g" to have the second meaning, not the first?
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|