RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda - PI WG Meeting - Wednesday 11 June at 19.00 UTC
Thanks & Thanks. J Chuck From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 8:59 AM To: Gomes, Chuck; tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda - PI WG Meeting - Wednesday 11 June at 19.00 UTC Yes and yes. Best regards, Marika From: <Gomes>, Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday 12 June 2014 14:38 To: "tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda - PI WG Meeting - Wednesday 11 June at 19.00 UTC Marika, Am I correct in assuming that Tom's input will be added to the document.? On another note, I meant to bring this up before our meeting ended yesterday but forgot. It seems to me that it would be for helpful for our meeting in London if we were able to create a condensed version of this document that could be easily shared with the community so that they can see our progress and follow the continuing work that we do in London. First of all, I think the condensed version should be created on a different platform instead of Excel. Excel is designed to crunch numbers and it doesn't have features that would be helpful in this case such as fixing header rows and header columns and not allowing rows to break across pages. My personal recommendation would be to use Microsoft Word because I am very familiar with it for purposes like this but I am open to other suggestions. Second, I think the condensed version should show a very brief description of the GNSO activity reviewed plus the following: strong points, weak points and lessons learned. Please let me know if you think this is a good idea. Mary/Marika - Is this something that is doable before London? Chuck From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Barrett Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 2:53 PM To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda - PI WG Meeting - Wednesday 11 June at 19.00 UTC I have a comment regarding column 11: Board request concerning .brand RA, specification 13 It seems odd to start this item with the events in April, 2014. It seems more appropriate to go back to December, 2013 with the initial proposal from the BRG. ICANN called it "Proposal for a Specification 13 to the ICANN Registry Agreement to Contractually Reflect Certain Limited Aspects of ".Brand" New gTLDs https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2013-12-06-en Thomas Barrett EnCirca, Inc. - President 400 West Cummings Park, #1725 Woburn, MA US 01801 +1.781.942.9975 ext: 11 +1.781.823.8911 (fax) +1.781.492.1315 (cell) From:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@ican n.org]On Behalf Of J. Scott Evans Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:11 PM To: Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda - PI WG Meeting - Wednesday 11 June at 19.00 UTC Dear All: I have attached a revised copy of the Deliverable I-A chart. My comments in the Strong/Weak categories are in blue text. I hope others will also chime in with their view points. J. Scott j. scott evans - associate general counsel - adobe - 408.536.5336 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx _____ From: marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:16:34 -0700 Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda - PI WG Meeting - Wednesday 11 June at 19.00 UTC Dear All, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next Policy & Implementation WG meeting which is scheduled for Wednesday 11 June at 19.00 UTC. Best regards, Marika Proposed Agenda - Policy & Implementation WG Meeting - 11 June 2014 1. Roll Call / SOI 2. Continue review of Deliverable I-A Review Chart (see latest version attached) 3. Agenda for F2F meeting in London (see http://london50.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-policy-implementation) 4. Review current version of work plan (see https://community.icann.org/x/rC_fAg) 5. Continue review of deliverable I-C questions (if time allows - see latest version attached) 6. Confirm next steps / next meeting Attachment:
smime.p7s
|