[gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: ALAC & ISPCP input
Thanks for the quick response Mary and special thanks to Olevie for preparing the ISPCP input summary. It seems to me that both of these summaries and the comments below provide a good basis for communicated with the two groups to let them know and how their input has been considered to date and will be considered going forward. Chuck From: Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:08 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; Michael Graham Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: ALAC & ISPCP input Hello Chuck, Michael and everyone, The current draft Working Principles do take on board some of the ALAC's suggested principles, in particular the need for: (1) a methodology that recognizes when a decision may impact the community, (2) a bottom up process to address such decisions, and (3) time sensitive processes. What the Principles may not yet fully address are the points regarding a way to come to closure when the community is divided on an issue, and the role of the Board in such an instance. These can be taken up by the WG when it returns to reviewing the draft Principles after completing its work on the various Deliverables, unless there is a reason to do so earlier. On a separate but related note, attached to this email is a chart that Olevie prepared on the ISPCP constituency input, which in the last column shows whether the WG has considered the feedback. As it proceeds with its deliberations on implementation issues, the WG may wish to note that the ISPCP constituency made two specific suggestions - first, a mandatory community implementation team for certain types of PDP work, and secondly, public comment periods after certain milestones are reached during implementation. Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx From: <Gomes>, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 at 10:02 AM To: Michael Graham <gnosisiplaw@xxxxxxxxx>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Agenda and draft documents for WG call on 13 August 2014 Thank you very much Michael. In your opinion, do you think there is anything in the ALAC comments that should be incorporated in our Deliverable I work? In my view, the ALAC principles are very useful. I think we considered them when we developed our principles but that has been quite a long time ago so I think it would be useful to do a quick check to see if we did that. I wonder if Mary or Marika could do a comparison of the ALAC principles to the ones we developed and identify which of our principles include the ALAC principles. If any of the ALAC principles are not included in our principles, then we could develop a rationale for why not or consider adding them. We should then have a good basis for replying to the ALAC and communicating how their input has been used. Chuck From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Graham Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 3:00 AM To: Mary Wong Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Agenda and draft documents for WG call on 13 August 2014 I attach a summary of the ALAC comments for consideration. Michael R. <http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-CrAltpPIEY0/UoGzs1YufPI/AAAAAAAAAHo/TWru__Mgzeo/s 1600/GSignatureemailsmall.jpg> mgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Dear WG members, Here is the proposed agenda for the WG call on Wednesday 13 August: 1. Roll Call/Updates to SOI 2. Finalize proposed PGP/PIP flow chart (circulated on 11 August) 3. Complete discussion on Deliverable I (sub-questions E(a), E(b) and E(c)) 4. Update on SO/AC/SG/C input received in relation to Deliverable I (reports from Cheryl, Olevie, Michael) 5. [if time permits] Commence discussions on Deliverable II (attached) In addition, a suggested draft email that can be sent to SG/C chairs soliciting their groups' feedback on the proposed GNSO Processes Flowcharts is attached for your review. As you'll recall from the call last week, it was agreed that a consistent approach and thus a uniform email should be sent on this topic. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 <tel:%2B1%20603%20574%204892> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx Attachment:
smime.p7s
|