RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: ALAC & ISPCP input

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you very much Cheryl.  This greatly facilitated my task of drafting a 
letter to the RySG.

Chuck

From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr [mailto:langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:40 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Mary Wong
Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: ALAC & ISPCP input

Hi all I finally got around to integrating my review of the comments from RySG 
into Olevie's table (with a few modifications ;-) I hope this is what is 
desired if not let me know...

PDF and .dox copy attached as newly named files



Cheryl Langdon-Orr ...  (CLO)

about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr







On 18 August 2014 17:58, Gnosis IP Law & Consulting 
<gnosisiplaw@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnosisiplaw@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Chuck and Mary:

Sorry for the delayed response — chalk it up to cross-country trucking fatigue.

Anyway, as Mary points out, the three major concerns expressed by the ALAC in 
their comments have been incorporated as part of Deliverable 1 and are 
important components of this.  The subsequent letters to the ALAC and ISPCP are 
excellent as well.

Michael R.

On Aug 13, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Gomes, Chuck 
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


Thanks for the quick response Mary and special thanks to Olevie for preparing 
the ISPCP input summary.  It seems to me that both of these summaries and the 
comments below provide a good basis for communicated with the two groups to let 
them know and how their input has been considered to date and will be 
considered going forward.

Chuck

From: Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:08 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Michael Graham
Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ALAC & ISPCP input

Hello Chuck, Michael and everyone,

The current draft Working Principles do take on board some of the ALAC’s 
suggested principles, in particular the need for: (1) a methodology that 
recognizes when a decision may impact the community, (2) a bottom up process to 
address such decisions, and (3) time sensitive processes. What the Principles 
may not yet fully address are the points regarding a way to come to closure 
when the community is divided on an issue, and the role of the Board in such an 
instance. These can be taken up by the WG when it returns to reviewing the 
draft Principles after completing its work on the various Deliverables, unless 
there is a reason to do so earlier.

On a separate but related note, attached to this email is a chart that Olevie 
prepared on the ISPCP constituency input, which in the last column shows 
whether the WG has considered the feedback. As it proceeds with its 
deliberations on implementation issues, the WG may wish to note that the ISPCP 
constituency made two specific suggestions – first, a mandatory community 
implementation team for certain types of PDP work, and secondly, public comment 
periods after certain milestones are reached during implementation.

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892<tel:%2B1%20603%20574%204892>
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>


From: <Gomes>, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 at 10:02 AM
To: Michael Graham <gnosisiplaw@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnosisiplaw@xxxxxxxxx>>, Mary 
Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Agenda and draft documents for WG call on 13 
August 2014

Thank you very much Michael.  In your opinion, do you think there is anything 
in the ALAC comments that should be incorporated in our Deliverable I work?

In my view, the ALAC principles are very useful.  I think we considered them 
when we developed our principles but that has been quite a long time ago so I 
think it would be useful to do a quick check to see if we did that.  I wonder 
if Mary or Marika could do a comparison of the ALAC principles to the ones we 
developed and identify which of our principles include the ALAC principles.  If 
any of the ALAC principles are not included in our principles, then we could 
develop a rationale for why not or consider adding them.  We should then have a 
good basis for replying to the ALAC and communicating how their input has been 
used.

Chuck

From: 
owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Graham
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 3:00 AM
To: Mary Wong
Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Agenda and draft documents for WG call on 13 
August 2014

I attach a summary of the ALAC comments for consideration.

Michael R.

[https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-CrAltpPIEY0/UoGzs1YufPI/AAAAAAAAAHo/TWru__Mgzeo/s1600/GSignatureemailsmall.jpg]mgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Mary Wong 
<mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dear WG members,

Here is the proposed agenda for the WG call on Wednesday 13 August:

  1.  Roll Call/Updates to SOI
  2.  Finalize proposed PGP/PIP flow chart (circulated on 11 August)
  3.  Complete discussion on Deliverable I (sub-questions E(a), E(b) and E(c))
  4.  Update on SO/AC/SG/C input received in relation to Deliverable I (reports 
from Cheryl, Olevie, Michael)
  5.  [if time permits] Commence discussions on Deliverable II (attached)
In addition, a suggested draft email that can be sent to SG/C chairs soliciting 
their groups’ feedback on the proposed GNSO Processes Flowcharts is attached 
for your review. As you’ll recall from the call last week, it was agreed that a 
consistent approach and thus a uniform email should be sent on this topic.

Thanks and cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892<tel:%2B1%20603%20574%204892>
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>