RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Principle ii.b action item

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chuck et al.  I apologize belatedly for not being able to make yesterday's 
call.  I will listen to the mp3 over the weekend and would appreciate a link.  
In addition, for some reason, I am apparently not on the list in the mailing 
group of those receiving copies of the GDD implementation Framework document.  
I am sure Marika can address this. There could be an issue over lrlaw.com 
versus new address aaikman@xxxxxxxxxx but everyone else seems to have it.  
Thank you, Anne
Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | Suite 700
One South Church Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 5:19 PM
To: Avri Doria; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Principle ii.b action item


Thanks Avri.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:00 PM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Principle ii.b action item


Hi,

At the last meeting, I expressed concern about the wording of Principle II.B in 
the implementation framework and Chuck suggested that I provide some 
alternative wording. (that was a modified quote from Chuck's message reminding 
me to do this - what a chair!)

Re II.b

> B.    ICANN Staff strive to follow the letter and the intent underlying
> GNSO Consensus Policy recommendations when designing implementations
> and transforming Consensus Policy recommendations into Consensus
> Policies. Staff will be held accountable by the GNSO Council (or its
> agent, such as an implementation review team) for ensuring that the
> implementation of policies is consistent with the policy
> recommendations and the reasoning underlying the policy
> recommendations.

How about appending something like:

In any case where the intention of the GNSO, as interpreted by the ICANN Staff, 
does not correspond to a strict interpretation of the recommendation text 
itself, the Staff should consult with the GNSO for clarification.


avri


________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.