ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-policyimpl-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Consensus Call for Final Policy & Implementation WG Recommendations

  • To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Consensus Call for Final Policy & Implementation WG Recommendations
  • From: "Michael Graham (ELCA)" <migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:15:01 +0000

+++

Sent from my iPhone

On May 28, 2015, at 5:00 AM, "Greg Shatan" 
<gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

I'll add my voice to the chorus.  I support the outcome of our work, and 
congratulate our co-chairs, fellow members and our dedicated staff on a job 
well done!

Greg

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Amr Elsadr 
<aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Same here. Thanks to everyone for all the hard work in getting this done.

Amr

On May 28, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr 
<langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

> I'm happy too :-)
>
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr ...  (CLO)
>
> about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr<http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr>
>
>
>
>
> On 28 May 2015 at 06:49, J. Scott Evans 
> <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Ditto.
>
>
> j. scott evans - associate general counsel - adobe - 
> 408.536.5336<tel:408.536.5336> - 
> jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> From: AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
> gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 
> gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>; 
> migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: Consensus Call for Final Policy & 
> Implementation WG Recommendations
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:18:14 +0000
>
>
> I certainly support.  Excellent work everyone and special kudos to Chuck and 
> Marika and Mary!  Looking forward to the discussion at Council...
>
> Anne
>
>
> <image001.gif>
>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>
> (T) 520.629.4428<tel:520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725<tel:520.879.4725>
>
> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
> www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.LRRLaw.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: 
> owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx> 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>]
>  On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:46 PM
> To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Consensus Call for Final Policy & 
> Implementation WG Recommendations
> Importance: High
>
>
> As co-chairs of the Policy & Implementation WG, J. Scott and I have reached 
> the following conclusions:
>
> 1.       All of the public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the 
> WG and amendments made to the Initial Report as agreed to by the WG.
>
> 2.       There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated on 
> the WG list since Marika sent the latest redline version of the Final Report 
> to the WG list on 21 May with a response deadline of Tuesday 26 May at 14.00 
> UTC.
>
> 3.       There is full consensus of the WG on the Final Report as attached in 
> clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version highlights all 
> edits made to the Initial Report that was published for public comment in 
> March 2015 
> (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/policy-implementation-2015-01-19-en ).
>
>
> All WG participants have until 23:59 UTC on Friday, 29 May, 2015 to object to 
> the 'full consensus' call by the co-chairs.  If anyone objects, please 
> explain your reasons.  If no one objects in the allotted time, the report 
> will be sent by our Council Liaison Amr to the GNSO Council for their action 
> along with a draft motion for its approval.
>
>
> If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask.
>
>
> Thanks to everyone for helping us get to this point.
>
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
>
>
> "This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
> that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from 
> disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work 
> product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify 
> sender immediately and delete this message immediately."
>
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this 
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended 
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic 
> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy