Apologize for the format. I have now put this in pdf.
I appreciate your thoughts towards the agenda today, but the agenda
and format was suggested by members of the group on the last
call. An mp3 of the call is available and I am sure Glen would be
happy to resend it to you. It’s a little difficult to reset
expectations completely just 3 hours before a call as there is
usually prep work done prior. That said, agendas are not fixed in
stone so we can briefly address at the beginning of the call.
Also on the last call the group started with an initial discussion
of transition and it was the general sense of the group to continue
on the path that we were going; namely, to figure out a long term
new PDP process and not to spend time on just discussing
transition. There seemed to be no disagreement on the call on this
point. So, I think we are all in agreement that we are not
discussing an Interim PDP. Despite Mike’s post last week, if you
listen to the mp3 recording, you will note that no one even
suggested doing that.
Let me end this note by imploring you all to attend the calls or
alternatively listen to the mp3 recordings before commenting on
items you think may have been discussed on those calls. Its
unfortunate that time needs to be taken to address (and indeed
defend) points that were never even discussed.
Thank you.
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.: NeuStar, Inc.
Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only
for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error
and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the
original message.
From: Liz Williams [mailto:lizawilliams@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 8:01 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Tuesday's PDP Call
Jeff
I can't read the docx format documents. Could you either post them
on a wiki or send them in word format?
I also wanted to echo my support for Mike's post last week and
reiterate that it is only worth doing work that will be adopted
over the longer term and certainly not wasting any time on any
interim PDP proposals. That is a recipe for ensuring no policy
development work actually ever gets done that is within the "picket
fence" and which relates to either registrar or registry contracts.
I suggest that we focus on three main tasks.
1. Amendments to the GNSO Rules of Procedure (Article X) -- very
straightforward to do a line by line amendment of an existing
document taking into account the mammoth amount of discussion that
has taken place through the GNSO improvement process
2. A glossary of special terms -- see Bertrand's previous post
3. A set of timelines -- that ensure this group gets 1 & 2 done
above pre Sydney and our expectations for implementation.
Liz
On 14 Apr 2009, at 04:27, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
All,
I will note that to date we have not received any responses or
comments on Topic A identified in the Work Plan. A reminder that
our call is in on Tuesday and we will go through the questions for
Topic A. We are trying a new format. At the end of the call we
will take volunteers to take the notes from the call (which I will
ask ICANN staff to take) and start putting pen to paper to come up
with suggestions.
Enclosed please find a chart I did on Topic A and how it would
relate to the current PDP. You will note that most of the issues
brought up are NOT addressed by the current PDP.
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.: NeuStar, Inc.
Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only
for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error
and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the
original message.
From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-
pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 7:39 PM
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Action Items from Today's PDP Call
Dear All,
The following action items came out of our PDP Team call today:
1. Please respond to the Doodle to be sent out by Glen to
schedule the next call
2. Please review the Staff PDP Background Document posted on
the Wiki for ideas/comments for the Work Plan
3. Please review and email suggestions/comments on Topic A of
the Work Plan by Friday April 10th, since we will begin the
analysis of Topic A on the next call
4. Please review and comment on Bertrand’s suggested
terminology so that we can define and use consistent terms
5. I will try to schedule a call with the chairs of the other
GNSO Improvements work teams to avoid duplication of issues among
the respective groups
The Wiki link is:
https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/index.cgi?pdp_team
Best Regards,
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
<Topic A - Current PDP.docx>
<Topic A - Current PDP.pdf>