ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ppsc-pdp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Tuesday's PDP Call

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Tuesday's PDP Call
  • From: Sophia B <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:37:25 -0700

Hi Jeff-

Is it possible to have the draft pdp as part of the wiki in a format that we
can edit and store as goodle doc. i.e so that we can put our comments as we
work during the meetings?
Thanks
Sophia


On 4/14/09, Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Apologize for the format.  I have now put this in pdf.
>
>
>
> I appreciate your thoughts towards the agenda today, but the agenda and
> format was suggested by members of the group on the last call.   An mp3 of
> the call is available and I am sure Glen would be happy to resend it to
> you.  It’s a little difficult to reset expectations completely just 3 hours
> before a call as there is usually prep work done prior.  That said, agendas
> are not fixed in stone so we can briefly address at the beginning of the
> call.
>
>
>
> Also on the last call the group started with an initial discussion of
> transition and it was the general sense of the group to continue on the path
> that we were going; namely, to figure out a long term new PDP process and
> not to spend time on just discussing transition.  There seemed to be no
> disagreement on the call on this point.  So, I think we are all in agreement
> that we are not discussing an Interim PDP.  Despite Mike’s post last week,
> if you listen to the mp3 recording, you will note that no one even suggested
> doing that.
>
>
>
> Let me end this note by *imploring you all* to attend the calls or
> alternatively listen to the mp3 recordings before commenting on items you
> think may have been discussed on those calls.  Its unfortunate that time
> needs to be taken to address (and indeed defend) points that were never even
> discussed.
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq**.**:** **NeuStar, Inc.**
> *Vice President, Law & Policy
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Liz Williams [mailto:lizawilliams@xxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 14, 2009 8:01 AM
> *To:* Neuman, Jeff
> *Cc:* Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Tuesday's PDP Call
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> I can't read the docx format documents.  Could you either post them on a
> wiki or send them in word format?
>
>
>
> I also wanted to echo my support for Mike's post last week and reiterate
> that it is only worth doing work that will be adopted over the longer term
> and certainly not wasting any time on any interim PDP proposals.  That is a
> recipe for ensuring no policy development work actually ever gets done that
> is within the "picket fence" and which relates to either registrar or
> registry contracts.
>
>
>
> I suggest that we focus on three main tasks.
>
>
>
> 1.  Amendments to the GNSO Rules of Procedure (Article X) -- very
> straightforward to do a line by line amendment of an existing document
> taking into account the mammoth amount of discussion that has taken place
> through the GNSO improvement process
>
>
>
> 2.  A glossary of special terms -- see Bertrand's previous post
>
>
>
> 3.  A set of timelines -- that ensure this group gets 1 & 2 done above pre
> Sydney and our expectations for implementation.
>
>
>
> Liz
>
> On 14 Apr 2009, at 04:27, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
>
>
>
>  All,
>
>
>
> I will note that to date we have not received any responses or comments on
> Topic A identified in the Work Plan.  A reminder that our call is in on
> Tuesday and we will go through the questions for Topic A.  We are trying a
> new format.  At the end of the call we will take volunteers to take the
> notes from the call (which I will ask ICANN staff to take) and start putting
> pen to paper to come up with suggestions.
>
>
>
> Enclosed please find a chart I did on Topic A and how it would relate to
> the current PDP.  You will note that most of the issues brought up are NOT
> addressed by the current PDP.
>
>
>
> *Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq**.**:** **NeuStar, Inc.**
> *Vice President, Law & Policy
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [
> mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>] *On
> Behalf Of *Margie Milam
> *Sent:* Friday, April 03, 2009 7:39 PM
> *To:* Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* Glen de Saint Géry
> *Subject:* [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Action Items from Today's PDP Call
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> The following action items came out of our PDP Team call today:
>
>
>
> 1.       Please respond to the  Doodle to be sent out by Glen to schedule
> the next call
>
> 2.       Please review the Staff PDP Background Document posted on the
> Wiki for ideas/comments for the Work Plan
>
> 3.       Please review and email suggestions/comments on Topic A of the
> Work Plan by Friday April 10th, since we will begin the analysis of Topic
> A on the next call
>
> 4.       Please review and comment on Bertrand’s suggested terminology so
> that we can define and use consistent terms
>
> 5.       I will try to schedule a call with the chairs of the other GNSO
> Improvements work teams to avoid duplication of issues among the respective
> groups
>
>
>
> The Wiki link is:
>
> https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/index.cgi?pdp_team
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Margie Milam
>
> Senior Policy Counselor
>
>
>
>
>
> <Topic A - Current PDP.docx>
>
>
>
>


-- 
_____________________
Sophia Bekele
www.cbsintl.com
www.dotconnectafrica.org
www.sfbayisoc.org


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy