RE: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report: Last call

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry about it.  Was responding to Mike's comments. :-)
Am supportive of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Edmon



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Liz Williams
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 11:27 AM
> To: Edmon Chung
> Cc: gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-pro-wg] Final Report: Last call
> 
> Edmon
> 
> Debate has closed.  Please indicate which, if any, of the six
> recommendations you support.
> 
> Liz
> .....................................................
> 
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 02 Jun 2007, at 04:37, Edmon Chung wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-pro-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pro-
> >> wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
> >>
> >> I disagree with #1.  Indeed there is already a universal RPM
> >> called the
> >> UDRP, and it must be made more effective to deal with obvious
> >> criminal
> >> activity such as phishing and obvious typosquatting, and applied
> >> universally across all gTLDs and as many ccTLDs as possible.
> >
> > I think the idea is that there is no one all encompassing RPM.
> > UDRP is one part of the many RPMs a gTLD may use.  But my
> > interpretation of #1 is that there is no one universal RPM
> > "package" for all gTLDs.
> > If that is the case, perhaps some rewording would be useful...
> >
> > Edmon
> >