RE: [gnso-raa-b] Sections 1-4

[Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>]

 Statton-

Thank you for your comments.  The brackets were meant to be temporary until the 
ALAC endorsed the report on the 25th.   Once that occurs, we'll remove the 
brackets.   Since this is a joint ALAC/GNSO effort,  I believe the members of 
the At-Large Community wanted this statement to be included in the report, so I 
would hesitate to delete it.  Perhaps it can be included in another section so 
it doesn't seem so awkward?

Margie

From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Hammock, Statton
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:48 PM
To: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Sections 1-4


Steve,

I just had couple of minor edits for Sections 1 -4.

At the end of 1.1 there is this bracketed sentence which reads:

[In addition, during their meeting of 25 May 2010, the At-Large Advisory 
Committee (ALAC) by consensus endorsed the draft Initial Report on Proposals 
for Improvements to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement. ]
 I recommend deleting this sentence (if it was intended to remain) as the 
placement here seems awkward and I don't know why we would necessarily 
highlight this fact.

Also, a couple of "nits": I think we use "At-Large Community" as a capitalized 
term so we should check consistency. There are a few places where it appears as 
"At-Large community" (like in Section 4.1). Also in Section 4.1, last 
paragraph, there is a sentence that reads "A working group could conduct be 
chartered....."  I think we meant to delete the word "conduct" in this sentence.

Let me know if anyone has any questions.

Thanks.

Statton

 Statton Hammock
 Sr. Director, Law, Policy & Business Affairs

[cid:image001.gif@01CAF6A6.16868880]

P 703-668-5515  M 703-624-5031 
www.networksolutions.com<http://www.networksolutions.com>



________________________________
From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:40 AM
To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Revised draft of Section V


SubTeam B participants,

Following up on yesterday's call, attached please find a proposed revision of 
section V of the Initial Draft Report.  It lays out the two options for "next 
steps," and includes a draft of a brief supporting statement for the option 
that commands Strong Support within the SubTeam.  I understand that one of the 
registrar representatives (perhaps Statton?) will draft a statement of similar 
length for the alternative approach.  Of course, your comments and edits on 
anything in this document are welcomed.  Please circulated these as soon as 
possible, and in any case by Thursday of this week, so that we can stay on 
track for circulation of a "final" draft by staff no later than next Monday.  
Thanks.

Steve Metalitz

<<Section V draft (2697426).DOC>>