Re: [gnso-raa-b] Sections 1-4

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

The bracketed sentence was to indicate that the ALAC is expected to endorse
the report at it's next meeting on May 25th (ExCom having already started to
review the last draft)  That should be in the report somewhere  where you
put it I care less about as ALAC can be seen as = to a Council in an SO just
as the RALO & ALSes are seen as = to the members or constituencies of an
ICANN SO, such endorsement to a report to a Chartering Organisation *should*
be noted if not in the report then I'll send it to the Chair of the GNSO for
the Councils knowledge as Chair of the ALAC any way.


Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 19 May 2010 07:25, Metalitz, Steven <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Thanks Statton, I would defer to Cheryl or Holly re the bracketed
> sentence.  Thanks for catching the "nits."
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Hammock, Statton [mailto:shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:48 PM
> *To:* Metalitz, Steven; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-raa-b] Sections 1-4
>
>  Steve,
>
> I just had couple of minor edits for Sections 1 -4.
>
> At the end of 1.1 there is this bracketed sentence which reads:
>
> *[In addition, during their meeting of 25 May 2010, the At-Large Advisory
> Committee (ALAC) by consensus endorsed the draft Initial Report on Proposals
> for Improvements to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement. ]*
>
>  I recommend deleting this sentence (if it was intended to remain) as the
> placement here seems awkward and I don’t know why we would necessarily
> highlight this fact.
>
>
>
> Also, a couple of “nits”: I think we use “At-Large Community” as a
> capitalized term so we should check consistency. There are a few places
> where it appears as “At-Large community” (like in Section 4.1). Also in
> Section 4.1, last paragraph, there is a sentence that reads “A working group
> could conduct be chartered…..”  I think we meant to delete the word
> “conduct” in this sentence.
>
>
>
> Let me know if anyone has any questions.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Statton
>
>
>
> * Statton Hammock
> * Sr. Director, Law, Policy & Business Affairs
>
>  *P* 703-668-5515  *M *703-624-5031 <http://www.networksolutions.com>
> www.networksolutions.com
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Metalitz, Steven
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:40 AM
> *To:* gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-raa-b] Revised draft of Section V
>
>
>
> SubTeam B participants,
>
> Following up on yesterday's call, attached please find a proposed revision
> of section V of the Initial Draft Report.  It lays out the two options for
> "next steps," and includes a draft of a brief supporting statement for the
> option that commands Strong Support within the SubTeam.  I understand that
> one of the registrar representatives (perhaps Statton?) will draft a
> statement of similar length for the alternative approach.  Of course, your
> comments and edits on anything in this document are welcomed.  Please
> circulated these as soon as possible, and in any case by Thursday of this
> week, so that we can stay on track for circulation of a "final" draft by
> staff no later than next Monday.  Thanks.
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
> <<Section V draft (2697426).DOC>>
>
>
>