Re: [gnso-reg-sgc] Whois Sub Group C - matrix for discussion andadditions

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Maria Farrell wrote:
> Dear all,
>  
> The matrix I sent was agreed by this sub group last week. The group agreed -
> and its meeting summary explicitly records this - to have me create a matrix
> using the criteria agreed. If anyone has an issue with that, then they
> should raise it when the sub group meets again tomorrow. 

Perhaps I misunderstood the outcomes of that call then. I left the 
telecon under the impression that the issue was still a matter for 
future consideration and discussion and was not nearly as closed as 
you've implied. While it has some merit from an academic perspective, I 
certainly do not believe that anything this complex is nearly 
appropriate given the policy environment that we work in. Having only 
received an example of this matrix, I would have a hard time were this 
matter considered closed from a task perspective.

I will bring this up tomorrow.

Also, I asked a question of scope last week that I haven't heard 
anything on. Will we have an answer back for tomorrow's call?

Thanks,

-ross