RE: [gnso-reg-sgc] Whois Sub Group C - matrix for discussion andadditions

["Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff,

It is the ICANN policy staff's responsibility to ensure this working group
does its work in a focused way, and in a manner which is useful and
productive for ICANN as a whole.  

Large groups can only work productively if they use mutually agreed
procedures and accept agreed outcomes to allow them to continue moving
forward. This is perfect common sense and beyond discussion. 

Please keep your messages to this list focused on the substantive work. 

Thank you, Maria

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeff Williams
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 6:33 AM
To: gnso-reg-sgc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-reg-sgc] Whois Sub Group C - matrix for discussion
andadditions

Ross and all sgc members,

  I agree with Ross's concern here.  I also did not have the impression in
which Maria is espousing.  Btw, I trimmed the CC list as Maria has been very
adamant with me off-line regarding such for all sub groups.

  Maria, if you will pardon me, it is becoming obvious you are becoming
overly enamored with overly aggressive procedural masinations.  No offense
intended...

Ross Rader wrote:

> Maria Farrell wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The matrix I sent was agreed by this sub group last week. The group 
> > agreed - and its meeting summary explicitly records this - to have 
> > me create a matrix using the criteria agreed. If anyone has an issue 
> > with that, then they should raise it when the sub group meets again
tomorrow.
>
> Perhaps I misunderstood the outcomes of that call then. I left the 
> telecon under the impression that the issue was still a matter for 
> future consideration and discussion and was not nearly as closed as 
> you've implied. While it has some merit from an academic perspective, 
> I certainly do not believe that anything this complex is nearly 
> appropriate given the policy environment that we work in. Having only 
> received an example of this matrix, I would have a hard time were this 
> matter considered closed from a task perspective.
>
> I will bring this up tomorrow.
>
> Also, I asked a question of scope last week that I haven't heard 
> anything on. Will we have an answer back for tomorrow's call?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -ross

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827