Re: [gnso-res-sga] Whois working group -- subgroup A (reponsibilities)

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I am now confused.

On 15 maj 2007, at 16.12, Metalitz, Steven wrote:

> > a) It seems wise to not burden a registrant or a registrar with data
> > collection that is redundant. So if you are spending new resource on
> > making the OPOC accurate and responsive, why would you also continue
> > to spend resource on the unchanged obligations for admin and tech ?
> > Rolling these 3 functions into one seems logical. If WHOIS is then a
> smaller set of better relevant data, that seems a good outcome.


Does this mean that it is now within scope to recommend removing the  
Admin and Technical contact?

I.e. are we no longer talking about the OPOC as a role with  
responsibilities that could be taken over by either the admin or tech  
or another entity, but are actually allowing that we could do a  
replacement?

thanks
a.