<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic distribution SG council members
- To: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>, "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic distribution SG council members
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 09:00:59 -0400
Thanks Milton. I would be okay if the exception clause applied to the
Contracted House only. The reason I proposed an exception for both was
to attempt to treat both houses equitably. But if it is not believed
that there is a need for an exception for the Noncontracted/User house,
then we should not include it.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 6:12 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; Margie Milam; Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic
> distribution SG council members
>
> Chuck:
> I agree with the exception clause in the case of the
> contracting party house only. The Non-contracting House,
> which is supposed to be representative of global users,
> should have no trouble meeting diversity requirements. I note
> with amusement that NCUC will have no trouble meeting the
> even stronger diversity requirements required by our proposed
> NCSG charter, whereas the BC seems to need an exception -
> perhaps because it is really not every diverse or deep or
> representative. Perhaps we should consider taking some seats
> away from them in the Council, if they are unable to meet
> these simple, basic geographic diversity requirements.
>
> --MM
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-
> > dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 6:17 PM
> > To: Margie Milam; Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic
> > distribution SG council members
> >
> >
> > The questions below should focus only on the
> noncontracted/user house
> > but they apply to the contracted house as well. For both houses, I
> > had recommended more flexible language to allow for
> exceptions when it
> > was not possible to identify representatives who will qualified and
> > available to serve from some geographic region(s). In particular I
> > recommended the following: "For Stakeholder Groups with
> three seats on
> > the GNSO Council, no two representatives shall be citizens
> of the same
> > country or of countries located in the same Geographic
> Region except
> > in cases where a Stakeholder Group can demonstrate that
> there are no
> > eligible and available member representatives from three different
> > regions. For Stakeholder Groups with six seats on the GNSO
> Council, no
> > four representatives shall be citizens of the same country or of
> > countries in the same Geographic Region except in cases where a
> > Stakeholder Group can demonstrate that there are no eligible and
> > available member representatives from four different regions."
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 12:18 PM
> > > To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic
> > > distribution SG council members
> > >
> > >
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > To assist your discussions on these questions, I thought
> it would be
> > > useful to provide the current proposed language on the
> table related
> > > to these questions.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Margie Milam
> > > Senior Policy Counselor
> > > ICANN
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > _________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Currently Proposed Revisions:
> > >
> > > Each Stakeholder Group may select representatives
> according to its
> > > Charter procedures. No individual representative may
> hold more than
> > > one seat on the GNSO Council at the same time.
> > > For Stakeholder Groups with three seats on the GNSO
> Council, no two
> > > representatives shall be citizens of the same country or of
> > > countries located in the same Geographic Region except in cases
> > > where a Stakeholder Group can demonstrate that there are
> no eligible
> > > and available member representatives from three different
> regions.
> > > For Stakeholder Groups with six seats on the GNSO
> Council, no four
> > > representatives shall be citizens of the same country or of
> > > countries in the same Geographic Region except in cases where a
> > > Stakeholder Group can demonstrate that there are no eligible and
> > > available member representatives from four different regions.
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > _________________________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 9:34 PM
> > > To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic
> > > distribution SG council members
> > >
> > >
> > > Q5. In Section 3.1: Geographic distribution SG council members
> > >
> > > a) A change was proposed that allowed:
> > >
> > > - a Non Contracted Party SG to appoint up to 4
> (increased from 3)
> > > out of 6 council members from one geographic regions
> > >
> > >
> > > Should the change be retained?
> > >
> > > b) A general question was also asked about the clause
> allowing even
> > > these limits to be waived:
> > >
> > > - for the Non Contracted Parties in:
> > >
> > > except in cases where a Stakeholder Group can demonstrate
> that there
> > > are no eligible and available member representatives from four
> > > different regions.
> > >
> > > - for the Contracted Parties
> > >
> > > except in cases where a Stakeholder Group can demonstrate
> that there
> > > are no eligible and available member representatives from four
> > > different regions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Does this languages need to be changed?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|