RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q14 on privacy laws

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I support the rewording of the first sentence to "Each of the approved
Constituencies of each Stakeholder Group identified in paragraph 1 of
this Section (link TBD) shall maintain recognition with the ICANN
Board." 

Q14: I support the change that says, "consistent with applicable privacy
laws".

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 1:53 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q14 on privacy laws
> 
> 
> Article X, Section 5, Stakeholder Groups, Item 3
> 
> 
> Item 3 proposed changes from the document:
> 
> 
>       * Each Stakeholder Group identified in paragraph 1 of 
> this Section (link TBD) and each of its approved 
> Constituencies shall maintain recognition with the ICANN 
> Board.  Recognition is granted by the Board based upon the 
> extent to which, in fact, the entity represents the global 
> interests of the stakeholder communities it purports to 
> represent and operates to the maximum extent feasible in an 
> open and transparent manner consistent with prevailing 
> privacy laws and consistent with procedures designed to 
> ensure fairness.  Stakeholder Group and Constituency Charters 
> will be reviewed periodically as prescribed by the Board.
> 
> Should the first sentence be reworded to say, "Each of the 
> approved Constituencies of each Stakeholder Group identified 
> in paragraph 1 of this Section (link TBD) shall maintain 
> recognition with the ICANN Board." (Note that I reworded this 
> after the meeting.  I think I was consistent with what was 
> stated but please comment it if is not.)
> 
> 
> Q14 Should the change "consistent with prevailing privacy 
> laws"  be retained
> 
> *      Alternatively: should it be replaced with  "consistent with  
> applicable privacy laws"? or some other wording
> 
> 
> 
>