<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-restruc-dt] Q14 on privacy laws
- To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q14 on privacy laws
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:53:21 +0200
Article X, Section 5, Stakeholder Groups, Item 3
Item 3 proposed changes from the document:
• Each Stakeholder Group identified in paragraph 1 of this Section
(link TBD) and each of its approved Constituencies shall maintain
recognition with the ICANN Board. Recognition is granted by the Board
based upon the extent to which, in fact, the entity represents the
global interests of the stakeholder communities it purports to
represent and operates to the maximum extent feasible in an open and
transparent manner consistent with prevailing privacy laws and
consistent with procedures designed to ensure fairness. Stakeholder
Group and Constituency Charters will be reviewed periodically as
prescribed by the Board.
Should the first sentence be reworded to say, “Each of the approved
Constituencies of each Stakeholder Group identified in paragraph 1 of
this Section (link TBD) shall maintain recognition with the ICANN
Board.” (Note that I reworded this after the meeting. I think I was
consistent with what was stated but please comment it if is not.)
Q14 Should the change “consistent with prevailing privacy laws” be
retained
· Alternatively: should it be replaced with “consistent with
applicable privacy laws”? or some other wording
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|