RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed Avri.  We already reached consensus that each house would elect a
Vice Chair but we have not agreed on the procedures for those elections.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 10:21 AM
> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds
> 
> 
> hi,
> 
> I thought so.
> 
>   But what was not resolved was
> How the two were elected?
> Are the rules for electing the same in both house?
> And where are those rules documented?
> 60% threshold of a house?
> ...
> 
> I am assuming that each house elects its own.
> 
> a.
> 
> On 14 May 2009, at 16:15, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> >
> > It is my understanding as well that there would be one vice 
> chair per 
> > house.  Wasn't that previously resolved?
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> >> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Philip Sheppard
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 3:39 AM
> >> To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On balance thresholds are so important that getting them in the 
> >> by-laws does make sense.
> >>
> >> On vice-chairs, I thought the idea was to have 2 
> vice-chairs (one per 
> >> house).
> >> This needs to be resolved before we talk about selection methods.
> >>
> >> Philip
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
>