ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-restruc-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds - chairs and vice chairs

  • To: <gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds - chairs and vice chairs
  • From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:54:11 -0400

Interesting idea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
-- how would it work in our context?

Let's keep in mind that the 60% requirement of each house gives all four
Stakeholder Groups veto power over the selection of the Chair.  Hence,
to Philip's last point, the last 10 years of practice is irrelevant
precedent for the future.  It would be foolish to think that a SG won't
exercise its veto power at some point, and even more foolish not to have
a default system in place to deal with it if it does happen.

Thanks.

Jon   
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:47 AM
To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q18 on thresholds - chairs and vice chairs


Actually Avri I envisaged an STV system with eliminations whereby
eventually a winner must
emerge.










<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy