<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] SIC Feedback to Questions raised by the Drafting Team on Bylaws Changes
- To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-restruc-dt] SIC Feedback to Questions raised by the Drafting Team on Bylaws Changes
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:38:58 +0200
Hi,
Thank-you Raimundo, and please pass thanks on to the SIC for the work
and effort I am sure it took to arrive at these responses.
I have edited the By-laws on the workspace to reflect these
recommendations. As always, please check to make sure I did not miss
anything or get it wrong.
https://st.icann.org/gnso_transition/index.cgi?by_laws_with_proposed_changes_for_discussion
At todays meeting, I suggest we ask Raimundo to go over these changes
and then go through the edited version of the by-laws. With these
responses, I believe we may be close to finishing the pass of the by-
laws, though we will still work to do in other areas such as the
Operating rules and procedures to which some of the issues have been
moved. The Operating Rules and Procedures, however, is not on as
tight as schedule as the by-law changes, though they should still be
completed in time for the Board to approve before Seoul.
a.
On 8 Jun 2009, at 02:59, rbeca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Dear All:
As promised, I'm ataching you a set of Feedbacks from the SIC to the
10
Questions raised by the Drafting Team to he Board. Let me recall
that the
Board authorized the SIC to provide these Feedbacks. However, the SIC
opinion is only a recommedation to the Board, which it is not bind
to follow.
For sure, I would have liked to provide these Feedbacks quite before.
However, it was not possible.
Of course, feel free to raise any question at this respect.
Regards, Raimundo
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
<Feedbanks from the SIC to Bylaws_changes_questions.xls>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|