ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-sl-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-sl-wg] RE: Revised Single and Two-character subgroup report

  • To: "Patrick Jones" <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] RE: Revised Single and Two-character subgroup report
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:50:06 -0400

Is the following in item 3 of the Executive Summary a true statement:
"The recommendations of this report were approved by the RN WG for
inclusion in the 19 March 2007 report."?  Aren't the recommendations in
this report going to be different than the ones approved for the 19
March report?
 
Am I the only one who thinks that the following is not a clear way to
indicate that you are talking about 2-letter or 2 digit names or
combinations of 1 letter and 1 digit: "Single  Letter/Single  Digit
Combinations"?  Also, the wording would seem to imply the possibility of
2-digits.  How about "Combinations of one letter and one digit"?
 
The format for the Supporting Information is not exactly what I
suggested but I personally think the way you did it is a much better fit
for your report.  As long as Liz is okay with it, I think it works well.
 
 
 
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 


________________________________

        From: Patrick Jones [mailto:patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 7:49 PM
        To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Cc: Gomes, Chuck; 'Liz Williams'
        Subject: Revised Single and Two-character subgroup report
        
        

        Attached is an updated single and two character subgroup report,
with hopefully the last format update we'll do before inclusion of the
report into the final WG report next week. Please note that I have
incorporated the recommendations sent yesterday by Marilyn, updated the
symbols definition based on our discussion on the subgroup call, added
material to the single and two character IDN section, revised the digits
at the top level category, and added material to the supporting
resources at the end. I also updated the recommendation on single letter
single digit combinations at the top level.

         

        Patrick

         

        Patrick L. Jones

        Registry Liaison Manager

        Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

        4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330

        Marina del Rey, CA 90292

        Tel: +1 310 301 3861

        Fax: +1 310 823 8649

        patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx 

         



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy