RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Revised document with changes to single letter at 2nd level rec

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Minor question:  In the recommendation for IDNA valid strings, there is
an asterisk but I could not find where it is explained; is there an
explanation somewhere and if so where?
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alistair DIXON
        Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 3:17 AM
        To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Revised document with changes to single
letter at 2nd level rec
        
        
        At the last working group I volunteered to review the
recommendations on single letters and numbers at the second level.  I
have made amendments that arise from the RFC 1535 problem identified by
Steve Bellovin.  
         
        I have also reviewed the recommendations in relation to two
letters at the top level and, as discussed on the last working group
call, I confirm no change is required.
         
        Alistair