RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Revised document with changes to single letter at 2nd level rec

["Patrick Jones" <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>]

The asterisk points back to the full section, since we had a minority
recommendation carried over from the 19 March 2007 report. I can either take
out the asterisk or put a parenthetical, such as (see full recommendation
beginning on page 9).

 

Patrick

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 6:38 AM
To: Alistair DIXON; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Revised document with changes to single letter at
2nd level rec

 

Minor question:  In the recommendation for IDNA valid strings, there is an
asterisk but I could not find where it is explained; is there an explanation
somewhere and if so where?

 

Chuck Gomes

 

"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and
destroy/delete the original transmission." 

 

 


  _____  


From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Alistair DIXON
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 3:17 AM
To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Revised document with changes to single letter at 2nd
level rec

At the last working group I volunteered to review the recommendations on
single letters and numbers at the second level.  I have made amendments that
arise from the RFC 1535 problem identified by Steve Bellovin.  

 

I have also reviewed the recommendations in relation to two letters at the
top level and, as discussed on the last working group call, I confirm no
change is required.

 

Alistair