<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Revised document with changes to single letter at 2nd level rec
- To: <gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Revised document with changes to single letter at 2nd level rec
- From: "Patrick Jones" <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 08:24:26 -0700
Alistair's edits seem reasonable. If there are no objections, I will include
them.
Patrick
_____
From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Alistair DIXON
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:17 AM
To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Revised document with changes to single letter at 2nd
level rec
At the last working group I volunteered to review the recommendations on
single letters and numbers at the second level. I have made amendments that
arise from the RFC 1535 problem identified by Steve Bellovin.
I have also reviewed the recommendations in relation to two letters at the
top level and, as discussed on the last working group call, I confirm no
change is required.
Alistair
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|