[gnso-stability-thickwhois] SG/Const positions

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Folks, I am attaching an extract of the overall comment tool 
including our two questions as well as the overall one addressed to 
all sub-WGs.
I have tried to summarize the position of each group that submitted a 
statement to make it easier to understand to what extent we have 
consensus or not.
If I have mis-summarized anyone, please let us know. I note that the 
two questions really amount to the same thing if we do go with a 
thick Whois for all.
Trying to summarize the summaries, for those who have a comment, this 
is what I have come up with:
Stability: Would it be beneficial to keep all 4 copies of the Whois data?

Majority: Yes
Registrar SG: does not see any need
NCUC/NPOC: see that keeping both would possibly be harmful, with 
harms being discussed by other sub-WGs
Escrow: Is Registrar Escrow needed?

Majority: Yes
Registrar SG: No
NCUC: Keep both but require further study to see if needed.

Do we want to schedule a teleconference, or can we come to closure on 
this list?
Alan

Attachment: Escrow-Stability-AG-Review.xls
Description: