<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-sti] RE: Draft STI Report - V3 for your review
- To: "'Margie Milam'" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO STI'" <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-sti] RE: Draft STI Report - V3 for your review
- From: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:21:16 -0800
Margie,
Thanks for the quick turnaround on this and my comments are directed towards
the overall structure of the document, not whether we should use the word
shall, may or some other variant of the word in a certain section so do not
worry about the edits in sections.
There is a great deal of prominence given in the intro to the Trademark
Clearinghouse Proposal and throughout the TC area on the BC Minority Statement.
Since they were the first ones to voice their Minority Statement maybe it has
been given more prominence but I think this structure cannot hold once all
Minority Statements are submitted. I think you had it right when you wrote the
following statement "Those minority opinions that were know at the time this
Report was written are included. Others may be appended by Stakeholder Groups
prior to the vote of the GNSO Council" I think that should be the end of the
reporting and discussions on Minority positions and leave them for the
Appendix. By including every minority position in the summary and every point
it clouds the report and will just be a list of Minority positions.
Just to be clear this is not intended to quiet the BC position but looking
forward when everyone has their minority position submitted and all want to be
heard in the same way.
Would like to hear some feedback on these thoughts, which are meant to be
constructive and not towards stifling anyone's position and of course I will
not be on the call tomorrow to be yelled at for this so feel free to do it over
email. I guess this falls under my role as Margie wrote "plus a few non-lawyers
who worked hard to keep the work focused and clear."
Jeff
From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:38 PM
To: 'GNSO STI'
Subject: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report - V3 for your review
Importance: High
Dear All,
Attached for your review is the third draft of the STI Report, which attempts
to pick up everyone's comments and suggested revisions. Where there were
disagreements, I attempted to include each of the alternative proposals in
brackets.
My hope is that we will be able to get through the entire document on
tomorrow's call.
Best Regards,
Margie
_____________
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_____________
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|