Re: [gnso-sti] RE: Draft STI Report - V3 for your review
Well those words were actually mine, so I do support them, but I note that my preference was to delete all of the minority opinions in the right column as including some but not others gives them a level of relative importance that I do not think is appropriate. In the case of At-Large, we will not have an approved minority report for several days, and I would like to think they will not be treated as second-class comments because of their placement.
Your comment about making it more difficult to focus on the substance of the report is also true.
Alan At 08/12/2009 08:21 PM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
Margie, ....I think you had it right when you wrote the following statement "Those minority opinions that were know at the time this Report was written are included. Others may be appended by Stakeholder Groups prior to the vote of the GNSO Council"Would like to hear some feedback on these thoughts