Re: [gnso-sti] RE: Draft STI Report - V3 for your review

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well those words were actually mine, so I do support them, but I note 
that my preference was to delete all of the minority opinions in the 
right column as including some but not others gives them a level of 
relative importance that I do not think is appropriate. In the case 
of At-Large, we will not have an approved minority report for several 
days, and I would like to think they will not be treated as 
second-class comments because of their placement.
Your comment about making it more difficult to focus on the substance 
of the report is also true.
Alan

At 08/12/2009 08:21 PM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
> Margie,
> ....
>   I think you had it right when you wrote the following statement 
> "Those minority opinions that were know at the time this Report was 
> written are included. Others may be appended by Stakeholder Groups 
> prior to the vote of the GNSO Council"
> Would like to hear some feedback on these thoughts