ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] Consensus-candidate charter draft

  • To: "Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx DT" <Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] Consensus-candidate charter draft
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:22:43 -0400


In the section on other ICANN intiatives I think we should take into explicit 
account the work being done to create models and support for an adequate whois 
model and the ability to cover IDNs.  Not necessarily a dependency, but 
something it seems we should take into account.  I know it is covered under the 
rubric of 'work done by other SOAC' but I think this merits a specific mention.

Part of this goes to answer the question: when we requre thick whois, what 
flavor of thick whois services are we requiring?


On 28 Sep 2012, at 11:06, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> hi all,
> i'm attaching a new draft for you to review.  it would be absolutely terrific 
> if we could beat this draft up on the list and arrive at consensus on our 
> next (and hopefully final) call next Thursday.
> i'm shipping it without the redlining because the redline history is getting 
> pretty busy.  but it's all there if you'd like to review the changes in 
> detail.
> here's what's changing;
> - i drove that last draft version of the "transition to authoritative" 
> language in 
> - i added a footnote to clarify what we mean by "domains they sponsor"
> - i've wandered through the draft and tried to get the capitalization right 
> on the words registrar and registry 
> - i've summarily deleted a couple of Jeff's suggestions -- Jeff, there wasn't 
> much appetite for them on the last call, so this is your chance to 
> advocate/persuade if you feel really strongly (although i'll note that this 
> is really your second chance since you had the opportunity to post to the 
> list last week as well)
> - i've restructured a few sentences to swing them into the active voice and 
> made a few other (hopefully) cosmetic changes to the language.
> let's try to really kick this draft hard so we can polish this off on the 
> next call -- otherwise Marika tells me we'll miss the deadline for the 
> Toronto agenda and i'll have to work off my schedule failure as the 
> lowest-ranked roadie in her rock band.  ;-)
> thanks,
> mikey
> <Thick Whois Draft Charter - Updated 28 September 2012 - Mikey.doc>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy