<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Two items that may be relevant
- To: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Two items that may be relevant
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:21:58 -0500
At 30/01/2013 12:56 PM, Volker Greimann wrote:
Hi Alan,
one caveat:
So we do not need to debate whether a
transition to thick will yield more uniformity
or even whether uniformity is good, because
uniformity for all TLD, regardless of Whois
model will now (assuming the agreement does not collapse) be assured.
While most registrars are by now under the 2009
RAA, some are still under the 2001 agreement,
renewing into the 2009 agreement right now, or
have done so recently. Therefore, some
registrars will not be affected by the new RAA
until the RAA they are under at the time the new
RAA becomes official terms out. The old RAAs
have no "update provision". The worst case would
be that the new RAA would not become binding for
some registrars before 2017/2018, pushing back
uniformity way down the line. Anything we can do
right now to ensure uniformity as a change to
policy will bring this into being much, much sooner.
Good point.
Alan
On the registrars providing whois services, I
*think* I agree with the registrar position,
but really need to think about it a bit. But
the WG has two options I guess: a) say it is
currently under discussion and stay out of
debate; or b) take a position on which we
prefer and try to influence the outcome.
Sure thing, I am happy to discuss our position
on this. And I completely agree on the options you have outlined.
Best,
Volker.
Alan
At 30/01/2013 10:56 AM, Volker Greimann wrote:
Hi Alan,
indeed these have been part of the discussion
with ICANN in the RAA negotiations, both
flowing from requests of the registrars.
The first point is still a bit contentious as
ICANN seems very reluctant to remove any part
of whois obligations, however for us as
registrars it does not make sense to provide
this data if it is not referred to by the
registry and the duplication of the service
may lead to inconsistencies in the results
displayed. If the whois data is displayed by
the registry, and therefore the registry no
longer points to the whois server of the
registrar, that server becomes redundant. To
say it differently: While we currently operate
whois servers for the domains we have in thick
TLDs, the number of queries we get for those are negligible.
Of the two proposals, 2. is as good as a done
deal because poth parties agree that a
"uniform whois" is a good idea. There are
still differences about the exact language, but basic agreement is there.
This is the current language of the relevant
section of the new Whois Specification:
Following the publication by the IETF of a
Proposed Standard, Draft Standard or Internet
Standard and any revisions thereto (as
specified in RFC 2026) relating to the
web-based directory service as specified in
the IETF Web Extensible Internet Registration
Data Service working group, Registrar shall
implement the directory service specified in
any such standard (or any revision thereto) no
later than 135 days after such implementation
is requested by ICANN. Registrar shall
implement internationalized registration data
publication guidelines according to the
specification published by ICANN following the
work of the ICANN Internationalized
Registration Data Working Group (IRD-WG) and
its subsequent efforts, no later than 135 days
after it is approved by the ICANN Board.
1.1. The format of responses shall follow a
semi-free text format outline below, followed
by a blank line and a legal disclaimer
specifying the rights of Registrar, and of the user querying the database.
1.2. Each data object shall be represented as
a set of key/value pairs, with lines beginning
with keys, followed by a colon and a space as
delimiters, followed by the value.
1.3. For fields where more than one value
exists, multiple key/value pairs with the same
key shall be allowed (for example to list
multiple name servers). The first key/value
pair after a blank line should be considered
the start of a new record, and should be
considered as identifying that record, and is
used to group data, such as hostnames and IP
addresses, or a domain name and registrant information, together.
1.4. Domain Name Data:
1.4.1. Query format: whois h whois.example-registrar.tld EXAMPLE.TLD
1.4.2. Response format:
Domain Name: EXAMPLE.TLD
Registry Domain ID: D1234567-TLD
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.example-registrar.tld
Registrar URL:
<http://www.example-registrar.tld>http://www.example-registrar.tld
Updated Date: 2009-05-29T20:13:00Z
Creation Date: 2000-10-08T00:45:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2010-10-08T00:44:59Z
Registrar: EXAMPLE REGISTRAR LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 5555555
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
<mailto:email@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>email@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.1235551234
Reseller: EXAMPLE RESELLER [Note: Pending
discussion with registrars. Inserted based on request from Law Enforcement]
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 5372808-ERL
Registrant Name: EXAMPLE REGISTRANT
Registrant Organization: EXAMPLE ORGANIZATION
Registrant Street: 123 EXAMPLE STREET
Registrant City: ANYTOWN
Registrant State/Province: AP
Registrant Postal Code: A1A1A1
Registrant Country: AA
Registrant Phone: +1.5555551212
Registrant Phone Ext: 1234
Registrant Fax: +1.5555551213
Registrant Fax Ext: 4321
Registrant Email: <mailto:EMAIL@xxxxxxxxxxx>EMAIL@xxxxxxxxxxx
Registry Admin ID: 5372809-ERL
Admin Name: EXAMPLE REGISTRANT ADMINISTRATIVE
Admin Organization: EXAMPLE REGISTRANT ORGANIZATION
Admin Street: 123 EXAMPLE STREET
Admin City: ANYTOWN
Admin State/Province: AP
Admin Postal Code: A1A1A1
Admin Country: AA
Admin Phone: +1.5555551212
Admin Phone Ext: 1234
Admin Fax: +1.5555551213
Admin Fax Ext: 1234
Admin Email: <mailto:EMAIL@xxxxxxxxxxx>EMAIL@xxxxxxxxxxx
Registry Tech ID: 5372811-ERL
Tech Name: EXAMPLE REGISTRANT TECHNICAL
Tech Organization: EXAMPLE REGISTRANT LLC
Tech Street: 123 EXAMPLE STREET
Tech City: ANYTOWN
Tech State/Province: AP
Tech Postal Code: A1A1A1
Tech Country: AA
Tech Phone: +1.1235551234
Tech Phone Ext: 1234
Tech Fax: +1.5555551213
Tech Fax Ext: 93
Tech Email: <mailto:EMAIL@xxxxxxxxxxx>EMAIL@xxxxxxxxxxx
Name Server: NS01.EXAMPLE-REGISTRAR.TLD
Name Server: NS02.EXAMPLE-REGISTRAR.TLD
DNSSEC: signedDelegation
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting
System:
<http://wdprs.internic.net/>http://wdprs.internic.net/
[Note: this item is in response to a drafting team request]
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2009-05-29T20:15:00Z <<<
1.5. The format of the following data fields:
domain status, individual and organizational
names, address, street, city, state/province,
postal code, country, telephone and fax
numbers, email addresses, date and times must
conform to the mappings specified in EPP RFCs
5730-5734 (or its successors), and IPv6
addresses format should conform to RFC 5952
(or its successor), so that the display of
this information (or values returned in WHOIS
responses) can be uniformly processed and understood.
There are two issues that I understand may be
under discussion in the RAA amendment process
that might have an impact on this PDP.
1. The September RAA Negotiation update (
http://tinyurl.com/Sept-RAA) includes (Item
11) "The registrars have requested that the
obligation to provide a registrar--operator
Whois service be limited to thin registries
(i.e., .com and .net), as thick registries
provide centralized public data to Whois
data. Registries in the New gTLD Program are
required to be thick and follow service
level agreements." The status says that there
is agreement in principle. If that is a
done-deal, they we can take that question off of our list.
2. There has been discussion of ICANN
requiring a uniform presentation of Whois
information by all registrars (
http://tinyurl.com/Whois-display). I don't
see this in the list of RAA topics, so I am
not sure of the status. If this too is a
done-deal, then uniformity of display no
longer needs to be on our list. (Thanks to
Michele Neylon for the heads up on this).
Perhaps Volker can update us on both of these.
Alan
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email:
<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: <http://www.key-systems.net>www.key-systems.net /
www.RRPproxy.net
<http://www.domaindiscount24.com>www.domaindiscount24.com /
www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
<http://www.keydrive.lu>www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese
Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns
per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email:
<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: <http://www.key-systems.net>www.key-systems.net /
www.RRPproxy.net
<http://www.domaindiscount24.com>www.domaindiscount24.com /
www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay
updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
<http://www.keydrive.lu>www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom
it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content
of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this
e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this
e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting
us by telephone.
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: <http://www.key-systems.net>www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
<http://www.domaindiscount24.com>www.domaindiscount24.com
/ www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
<http://www.keydrive.lu>www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und
nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede
Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist
unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie
bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns
per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: <http://www.key-systems.net>www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
<http://www.domaindiscount24.com>www.domaindiscount24.com
/ www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
<http://www.keydrive.lu>www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only
for the person to whom it is addressed.
Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any
content of this email. You must not use,
disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If
an addressing or transmission error has
misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|