<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Idea of Phasing
- To: "'Eric Brunner-Williams'" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Idea of Phasing
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:43:50 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
> To claim to the contrary would be to claim that there is only
> one business model, implemented with marginally different prices and
> nominally (to make a pun) distinct inventories, the incumbent monopoly
> business model, originally implemented by the COM, NET, and ORG
> operator, and now available in the COM and NET and ORG operators,
> unchanged, and the BIZ and INFO operators.
>
> We don't want to come out of this with a solution for Verisign's
> market that destroys or prevents all others.
>
Agree. This WG is about allowing business model innovation in the context of
the new gTLD round. A lot of damage has been done by assuming that every new
tld is an aspirant .com, and therefore must be regulated in the same way as
.com.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|