Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Jointly Submitted Survey Concept

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hi Eric,

my thought here isn't so much to discuss the actual use-cases on the call, but 
to launch a use-case sub-group that can drive some of those issues to ground.  
you're right, discussing them all would blow out our 15 minute time-budget.

but i'm thinking that if we had some parallel work going on, some people 
focused on refining proposals others refining/analyzing use-cases, that we 
could move things forward.

thanks,

mikey


On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> I've observed that several of these are similar, without comment or
> correction by their authors. I'm not saying that my observation is
> necessarily correct, but if the authors of those use cases are
> certain, beyond doubt or discussion, that they represent vital and
> interestingly distinct use cases, that's a novel way to collaborate.
> 
> As a reminder, what distinguishes AMEX_IDs, COMSAST_IDs, FACEBOOK_IDs,
> iTune_IDs, google_IDs, RIM_ITs from each other?
> 
> 
> How is the association of some non-address identifier with a domain
> improve the hypothetical that for some reason domains are not
> transferable without mediation by the registry?
> 
> At a minute for each of 14 use case per model, most of the time is
> going to be spent visiting a series of vendor IDs.
> 
> Eric

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)