Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Single Registrant issue
- To: Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Single Registrant issue
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:47:43 -0500
Roberto's co-chair is frantically catching up on email... :-)
sorry about the delay. as usual the Co-Chair Mind-Reading System is working
and Roberto expressed our views perfectly.
On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:46 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>> I have been clear about thinking that this issue is not
>> precluded from our charter. And I believe that many other
>> people have followed a similar line of reasoning no matter
>> what their specific view on the subject.
>> But if someone is going to keep making what I believe is a
>> disruptive claim that something is out of scope, we better
>> deal with that issue. Basically the chairs need to let us or
>> CORE know so that we do not need to be continually the
>> recipients of a backhanded reprimand from CORE on this issue.
> I thought I have expressed my thoughts in a sufficiently clear way, so
> unless my co-chair has a different view we will accept discussion points
> related to SR, as well as points that are orthogonal to it.
> I am sure that SR is not the only subject that one or more WG members would
> not like to see discussed. My take is that, while there is no obligation to
> contribute for who does not want to, there is no reason for stopping the
> others from discussing it.
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)