<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Depressing consequences
- To: "'Drazek, Keith'" <Keith.Drazek@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Antony Van Couvering'" <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Depressing consequences
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:59:34 -0400
And how many of those new TLDs can be considered successful?
> Milton, while the current separation system may have originally been
> designed to address the legacy monopoly of .com/.net/.org, it was also
> in place for all subsequent new TLDs before their first domains were
> registered. The 15% ownership cap and functional separation
> requirements extended well beyond "incumbent registries with market
> power in established TLDs." Neustar, Afilias, Tralliance, Telnic and
> the rest were once start-ups too. Regards, Keith
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|