RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a starter-list of Harms
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a starter-list of Harms
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:47:36 -0400
I am not able to be on the call that I believe is going on right now, but these
comments were submitted on the harms in comment periods on previous versions of
Even the presentation in Sydney -
(much of which I disagree with) documented potential harms.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:32 PM
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a starter-list of Harms
i liked the "Harms" conversation that Roberto kicked off and went looking for a
list, since several people mentioned that there were lists out there. i
couldn't really find one, so i decided to start building one for us. i've
attached my very-first, extra-lame draft version of the list and have also
included it in the agenda for the call today. please give this a quick read
and identify any that i've missed.
Roberto and i are thinking that we'll work through a basic risk assessment
process -- 1) describe the possible harms, 2) determine their likelihood and
importance and 3) describe ways to reduce their likelihood and impact. so this
is part one -- make sure we have a complete list...