Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a starter-list of Harms
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a starter-list of Harms
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:43:46 -0400
Mikey, one of the potential VI harms that was discussed earlier but
does not seem to be in your list is a large registrar who is also an
RSP applying pressure to prospective Registries to use their back-end
services or the registrar will not carry the TLD (or will not feature it).
I don't know to what extent this is an issue, but it was discussed in
earlier meetings looking at the competition studies.
At 31/05/2010 12:31 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
i liked the "Harms" conversation that Roberto kicked off and went
looking for a list, since several people mentioned that there were
lists out there. i couldn't really find one, so i decided to start
building one for us. i've attached my very-first, extra-lame draft
version of the list and have also included it in the agenda for the
call today. please give this a quick read and identify any that i've missed.
Roberto and i are thinking that we'll work through a basic risk
assessment process -- 1) describe the possible harms, 2) determine
their likelihood and importance and 3) describe ways to reduce their
likelihood and impact. so this is part one -- make sure we have a