ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] the way forward regarding proposals, drafts and polls

  • To: "'vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] the way forward regarding proposals, drafts and polls
  • From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:32:29 -0400

I agree with Volker here. Saying that the WG agrees that DAGv4 is not an 
optimal one-size-fits-all solution is an important contribution and may 
actually be a point of consensus! 

Even those of us who want to use DAGv4 as the baseline for an exceptions 
process would be deeply disappointed if there were no exceptions, and would 
consider it to be a very bad policy.

--MM

> We should make clear that this is what we understand to be the default
> position due to the Nairobi decision and subsequent statements of the
> board, but that this position not desired by or has the support of the
> majority of the group. I believe if we can be said to have reached
> something resembling consensus on one issue so far it is that the
> default position is not desired by most of us.






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy