Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] the way forward regarding proposals, drafts and polls

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

does somebody want to draft up a poll-question that captures this thread?  i'm 
happy to add such a question to the poll so we could measure the sense of the 
group.

mikey


On Jul 13, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> 
> I agree with Volker here. Saying that the WG agrees that DAGv4 is not an 
> optimal one-size-fits-all solution is an important contribution and may 
> actually be a point of consensus! 
> 
> Even those of us who want to use DAGv4 as the baseline for an exceptions 
> process would be deeply disappointed if there were no exceptions, and would 
> consider it to be a very bad policy.
> 
> --MM
> 
>> We should make clear that this is what we understand to be the default
>> position due to the Nairobi decision and subsequent statements of the
>> board, but that this position not desired by or has the support of the
>> majority of the group. I believe if we can be said to have reached
>> something resembling consensus on one issue so far it is that the
>> default position is not desired by most of us.
> 
> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)