Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] the way forward regarding proposals, drafts and polls

[Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe phrase it as two questions with a short introduction:

The board decision of Nairobi proposed strict limitations on VI/CO 
constellations, which have been included in DAG4 as a default position.
1) Do you consider this default position effective means of adressing 
the potential harms inherent in the new gTLD process? (Yes/No/Partially)
2) Do you consider the default position a position you could actively 
support or live with? (Support/Live with/Do not consider it an 
acceptable position)
These questions are fer from perfect, just the best I could come up with 
on short notice.
Volker
> does somebody want to draft up a poll-question that captures this thread?  i'm 
> happy to add such a question to the poll so we could measure the sense of the 
> group.
>
> mikey
>
>
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
>   
> > I agree with Volker here. Saying that the WG agrees that DAGv4 is not an optimal one-size-fits-all solution is an important contribution and may actually be a point of consensus! 
> >
> > Even those of us who want to use DAGv4 as the baseline for an exceptions 
> > process would be deeply disappointed if there were no exceptions, and would 
> > consider it to be a very bad policy.
> >
> > --MM
> >
> >     
> > > We should make clear that this is what we understand to be the default
> > > position due to the Nairobi decision and subsequent statements of the
> > > board, but that this position not desired by or has the support of the
> > > majority of the group. I believe if we can be said to have reached
> > > something resembling consensus on one issue so far it is that the
> > > default position is not desired by most of us.
> > >       
> >     
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 	651-647-6109  
> fax  		866-280-2356  
> web 	http://www.haven2.com
> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
>
>
>   

--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.key-systems.net/facebook
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede 
Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist 
unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per 
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.key-systems.net/facebook
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this 
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an 
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the 
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.