Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] the way forward regarding proposals, drafts and polls

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

Volker,

For example,  you could vote 'Yes' to 1) and 'Do Not Consider it Acceptable' 
for (2.  ---  which would mean you think the DAG4 would be effective in 
controlling harms but you think that overall there's a better solution than 
DAG4.

Is that right?

RT


On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH wrote:

> 
> Maybe phrase it as two questions with a short introduction:
> 
> The board decision of Nairobi proposed strict limitations on VI/CO 
> constellations, which have been included in DAG4 as a default position.
> 1) Do you consider this default position effective means of adressing the 
> potential harms inherent in the new gTLD process? (Yes/No/Partially)
> 2) Do you consider the default position a position you could actively support 
> or live with? (Support/Live with/Do not consider it an acceptable position)
> 
> These questions are fer from perfect, just the best I could come up with on 
> short notice.
> 
> Volker
>> does somebody want to draft up a poll-question that captures this thread?  
>> i'm happy to add such a question to the poll so we could measure the sense 
>> of the group.
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 13, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> 
>>  
>>> I agree with Volker here. Saying that the WG agrees that DAGv4 is not an 
>>> optimal one-size-fits-all solution is an important contribution and may 
>>> actually be a point of consensus! 
>>> Even those of us who want to use DAGv4 as the baseline for an exceptions 
>>> process would be deeply disappointed if there were no exceptions, and would 
>>> consider it to be a very bad policy.
>>> 
>>> --MM
>>> 
>>>    
>>>> We should make clear that this is what we understand to be the default
>>>> position due to the Nairobi decision and subsequent statements of the
>>>> board, but that this position not desired by or has the support of the
>>>> majority of the group. I believe if we can be said to have reached
>>>> something resembling consensus on one issue so far it is that the
>>>> default position is not desired by most of us.
>>>>      
>>>    
>> 
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone        651-647-6109  fax               866-280-2356  web       
>> http://www.haven2.com
>> handle       OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
>> Google, etc.)
>> 
>> 
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> 
> Volker A. Greimann
> - Rechtsabteilung -
> 
> Key-Systems GmbH
> Im Oberen Werk 1
> 66386 St. Ingbert
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> 
> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
> www.key-systems.net/facebook
> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> 
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
> 
> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen 
> Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder 
> Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese 
> Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per 
> E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> 
> Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Volker A. Greimann
> - legal department -
> 
> Key-Systems GmbH
> Im Oberen Werk 1
> 66386 St. Ingbert
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> 
> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
> www.key-systems.net/facebook
> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> 
> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
> Registration No.: HR B 1861 - Zweibruecken
> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
> 
> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is 
> addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this 
> email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an 
> addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify 
> the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>