Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Re: "Rules" for proposal-summaries and Principles-summaries

[Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

wow. i feel like i wrote a vanishing note.

Only our common (mis)interpretation of the resolution can explain our 
acts in consequence.
Can you think of a currently contracted party not eliminated from 
re-obtaining contracted party status, as a registry, by the Nairobi 
resolution?
Do you think that is the self-evident reading of the Nairobi resolution?

I don't.

Only we can explain our reading of the text, and therefore our 
subsequent acts.
Eric

On 7/16/10 7:23 PM, Richard Tindal wrote:
> Understand and agree
>
> Given all you say about Nairobi though - how could you (or anyone except a 
> board member) turn it into other words?
>
> I don't think any of us are able to turn Nairobi into a summary - hence I think 
> we just include the 70 word resolution itself.
>
> RT
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > What the resolution states is not what the working group understood it to 
> > state, hence our original (and unanswered) questions to ... a void.
> >
> > Further, the Board resolution is not couched in language intended to inform, 
> > and elicit, informed public comment.
> >
> > The Board resolution language does not make plain that all 2001 and all 2004 
> > registries have liabilities, either actual ownership interests by registrars, 
> > or use a registrar's technical facilities for the registry's service provider.
> >
> > The uninformed reader of the Board resolution has no way to grasp from that one 
> > sentence that no registry contract will be concluded with any existing 
> > contracted party.
> >
> > Since we know this, we should make it known to the reader, else the public 
> > comment we get will be unable to interpret those few words as we do, and 
> > therefore be unable to correctly associate our work with the Board's resolution.
> >
> > Thanks for volunteering to do the 200 kind words on the sublime beauty of 
> > DAGv4, I suppose I'm a likely candidate for 200 kind words on the 2% less 
> > sublime beauty of Nairobi.
> >
> > Eric