<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] DAG4
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] DAG4
- From: Jean Christophe VIGNES <jcvignes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:04:08 +0200
And I want the next round of TLDs to start tomorrow ;-)
Seriously Mikey, kudos for the job done, once again.
JC
Le 22/07/10 16:58, « Mike O'Connor » <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
i'd like to get these remaining issues hammered out before the call if
possible. my goal for the call is short, boring, no debates.
On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
Can we discuss on the call today? Have not had time to focus on this yet and
frankly trying to catch up on everything non-VI related.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:57 AM
To: briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] DAG4
anybody have a problem with this?
i'll assume this is OK unless i hear otherwise...
mikey
On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Brian Cute wrote:
I commend the drafters (primarily RT and JN I believe) for their good attempt
to interpret the meaning and potential implication of DAG4. I think it needs
to be made explicit that individual members of the VIWG don’t necessarily
adhere to this interpretation since it remains unclear what implementation of
DAG4 would look like if that’s what the final policy became. Could a phrase to
that effect be added to the text? “nor do all individual members of the VIWG
adhere to this interpretation.”
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
______________________
Jean-Christophe Vignes
Executive Vice-President & General Counsel
DCL Group
2, rue Léon Laval
L-3372 Leudelange
Tel.: +352 20 200 123
Mobile : +352 691 600 424
Fax.: +352 20 300 123
Mailto: JCVignes@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.datacenter.eu | www.eurodns.com | www.voipgate.com
________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and
delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its
contents to anyone.
Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
--------------------------------------------------------
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|